Democracy: ' ' government of the people; popular sovereignty; democratismo' ' , concept according to Aurlio. When hearing this word, certainly comes in them to the somewhat familiar mind, it could not be of another form when we are in a characterized country democratic and whose value is remembered in them constantly. But, when hearing the concept, perhaps let us not make familiar in them in such a way thus. Such conceptual words do not configure the reality in our country, thus distanciando of this universal definition and creating a proper conception of what it is the democracy played here. Historically, we can say that the democracy never had a legitimate society. Coming back toward its ' ' bero' ' in old Greece, we come across in them with a society where the citizens could decide directly on the subjects of its interest, having right of speaking and voting its laws, beyond acting as governing. However, for the Greeks, citizens were all the people little women, slaves and foreigners and this implied, at the time, in 98% of the population.

This it did not configure not even the concept that had at the time, according to Aristotle, of whom democracy is a government form where the decisions politics are taken directly by the people and not for its representatives; therefore until then, it had representatives (2% of the population). Coming back us again toward ours ' ' lar' ' , Brazil. A country that since its first steps is marked by the submission, alienation and repression, ' ' preconceitos' ' these that are reflected you are welcome more than what of the social inaquality. High, average classroom, low and even though without classroom; these denominations are fruits of the reality, this that finishes for characterizing each one of them how much to the access to the education, feeding, health and to the corporeal properties.

Ah, that homesickness that I have of the time where did not have indices, research and results, where ' ' alunos' ' they were not numbers. In education still we are engatinhando in what respect says to great theories that if they collate and we, who we love the profession, use more dons born and the certainty of that not he exists pupil (that one that does not have light) and yes small human beings. The education and the professors come being massacreed in consequence of the system and insist on this way for believing. is a solitary and persistent fight. For not giving up and because, for me, this profession is more than money in the pocket, he is that I search a look beyond the indices (not for vanity, small feelings who does not find fertile land in my way) the way is of rocks, molded in the long run, sedimented of education, interaction, humanizao.

In this way, side by side we look the being, this exactly forgotten, abandoned and transformed into research. Until when we go to be objects and not citizens of this situation? It has schools where children are human beings with past, gift and, mainly, future. With histories to enchant, but that they do not give ibope. It never gave, why today, still more today, would go to give? But they exist, are enough to want to look at. I am a indisciplinada pupil, I deserve palmatria, reprovao. In the school of the man I am she-ass, in the my history of life I am a citizen who, for incredible that she seems, still believes ' ' great men? . The elections are there and ask for to the candidates: They look at deeply for the education, they respect and they value teeny, for that they have faith, them are the kingdom of God, abandoned for the men, not for God. I have faith.